↓ Skip to main content

Day centres for severe mental illness

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
6 tweeters
weibo
1 weibo user

Citations

dimensions_citation
35 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
66 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Day centres for severe mental illness
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2007
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd001710.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jocelyn Sarah Catty, Tom Burns, Adelina Comas, Zoe Poole

Abstract

The number of people with severe mental illness who receive treatment whilst living at home has increased greatly over the last 30 years. Day centres and day hospitals frequently supplement this treatment.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 66 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 1 2%
Brazil 1 2%
Unknown 64 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 12 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 14%
Student > Bachelor 8 12%
Student > Postgraduate 6 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 9%
Other 17 26%
Unknown 8 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 19 29%
Psychology 11 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 14%
Social Sciences 5 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 5%
Other 8 12%
Unknown 11 17%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 April 2017.
All research outputs
#2,148,238
of 12,527,093 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,400
of 8,923 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#52,137
of 286,798 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#132
of 231 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,527,093 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,923 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 286,798 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 231 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.