↓ Skip to main content
Embed badge What is this page?

Chronic pain associated with the Chikungunya Fever: long lasting burden of an acute illness

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Infectious Diseases, February 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
12 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
77 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
143 Mendeley

What is this page?

Summary Blogs Twitter Facebook Dimensions citations
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Chronic pain associated with the Chikungunya Fever: long lasting burden of an acute illness
Published in
BMC Infectious Diseases, February 2010
DOI 10.1186/1471-2334-10-31
Pubmed ID
20170492
Authors

Daniel Ciampi de Andrade, Sylvain Jean, Pierre Clavelou, Radhouane Dallel, Didier Bouhassira

Abstract

Chikungunya virus (CHIKV) is responsible for major epidemics worldwide. Autochthonous cases were recently reported in several European countries. Acute infection is thought to be monophasic. However reports on chronic pain related to CHIKV infection have been made. In particular, the fact that many of these patients do not respond well to usual analgesics suggests that the nature of chronic pain may be not only nociceptive but also neuropathic. Neuropathic pain syndromes require specific treatment and the identification of neuropathic characteristics (NC) in a pain syndrome is a major step towards pain control.

View on publisher site

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 143 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 140 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 29 20%
Student > Master 18 13%
Researcher 16 11%
Other 13 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 8%
Other 36 25%
Unknown 19 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 47 33%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 7%
Immunology and Microbiology 7 5%
Other 27 19%
Unknown 27 19%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 October 2019.
All research outputs
#1,655,110
of 19,808,407 outputs
Outputs from BMC Infectious Diseases
#427
of 6,842 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,476
of 333,329 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Infectious Diseases
#45
of 639 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,808,407 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,842 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 333,329 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 639 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.

This page is provided by Altmetric.