↓ Skip to main content

Lithium versus antidepressants in the long-term treatment of unipolar affective disorder

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
62 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
123 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Lithium versus antidepressants in the long-term treatment of unipolar affective disorder
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2006
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003492.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Andrea Cipriani, Katharine A Smith, Sally SA Burgess, Stuart M Carney, Guy Goodwin, John Geddes

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 123 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 4 3%
Israel 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Romania 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 114 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 20 16%
Student > Master 13 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 9%
Student > Bachelor 10 8%
Other 36 29%
Unknown 21 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 47 38%
Psychology 24 20%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 5%
Social Sciences 4 3%
Other 11 9%
Unknown 25 20%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 April 2019.
All research outputs
#1,876,018
of 14,616,544 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,629
of 11,033 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#71,013
of 400,665 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#112
of 234 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,616,544 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,033 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 400,665 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 234 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.