You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Reproducibility, sharing and progress in nanomaterial databases
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Nanotechnology, December 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1038/nnano.2017.233 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Alexander Tropsha, Karmann C. Mills, Anthony J. Hickey |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 15% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 8% |
| Australia | 1 | 8% |
| France | 1 | 8% |
| Germany | 1 | 8% |
| Canada | 1 | 8% |
| Ireland | 1 | 8% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 4 | 31% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 54% |
| Scientists | 5 | 38% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 64 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 64 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 31% |
| Researcher | 8 | 13% |
| Other | 5 | 8% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 5 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 11 | 17% |
| Unknown | 11 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chemistry | 11 | 17% |
| Engineering | 8 | 13% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 11% |
| Materials Science | 4 | 6% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 14 | 22% |
| Unknown | 17 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 July 2020.
All research outputs
#1,930,063
of 25,079,131 outputs
Outputs from Nature Nanotechnology
#1,450
of 3,685 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,626
of 452,086 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Nanotechnology
#26
of 67 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,079,131 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,685 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 452,086 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 67 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.