You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Physiological changes after fluid bolus therapy in sepsis: a systematic review of contemporary data
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Care, December 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13054-014-0696-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Neil J Glassford, Glenn M Eastwood, Rinaldo Bellomo |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 42 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 9 | 21% |
| United States | 3 | 7% |
| Australia | 2 | 5% |
| Colombia | 1 | 2% |
| Italy | 1 | 2% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 2% |
| Costa Rica | 1 | 2% |
| Canada | 1 | 2% |
| Ecuador | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Unknown | 20 | 48% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 19 | 45% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 12 | 29% |
| Scientists | 6 | 14% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 5 | 12% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 178 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| Turkey | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 171 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Postgraduate | 24 | 13% |
| Researcher | 22 | 12% |
| Other | 19 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 11% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 15 | 8% |
| Other | 48 | 27% |
| Unknown | 31 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 129 | 72% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 2% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 2% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 5 | 3% |
| Unknown | 31 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 31. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 December 2015.
All research outputs
#1,309,095
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#1,103
of 6,627 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,040
of 364,674 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#7
of 117 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,627 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 364,674 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 117 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.