↓ Skip to main content

Uterine artery embolization for symptomatic uterine fibroids

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
11 tweeters
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
96 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
209 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Uterine artery embolization for symptomatic uterine fibroids
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd005073.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Janesh K Gupta, Anju Sinha, M A Lumsden, Martha Hickey

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 209 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 206 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 35 17%
Researcher 30 14%
Other 25 12%
Student > Postgraduate 21 10%
Student > Master 21 10%
Other 45 22%
Unknown 32 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 111 53%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 5%
Social Sciences 9 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 3%
Other 20 10%
Unknown 39 19%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 January 2020.
All research outputs
#1,955,119
of 15,432,515 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,652
of 11,179 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,953
of 304,732 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#125
of 243 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,432,515 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,179 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 304,732 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 243 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.