↓ Skip to main content

Uterine artery embolization for symptomatic uterine fibroids

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
11 tweeters
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
76 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
153 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Uterine artery embolization for symptomatic uterine fibroids
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd005073.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Janesh K Gupta, Anju Sinha, M A Lumsden, Martha Hickey

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 153 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
Spain 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 149 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 26 17%
Researcher 23 15%
Other 18 12%
Student > Master 18 12%
Student > Postgraduate 17 11%
Other 35 23%
Unknown 16 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 95 62%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 3%
Psychology 5 3%
Social Sciences 5 3%
Other 10 7%
Unknown 23 15%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 January 2020.
All research outputs
#1,761,607
of 14,322,412 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,480
of 10,950 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,489
of 298,184 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#122
of 246 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,322,412 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,950 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 298,184 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 246 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.