↓ Skip to main content

β-Alanine supplementation enhances human skeletal muscle relaxation speed but not force production capacity.

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Applied Physiology, December 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
73 tweeters
facebook
6 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Readers on

mendeley
36 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
β-Alanine supplementation enhances human skeletal muscle relaxation speed but not force production capacity.
Published in
Journal of Applied Physiology, December 2014
DOI 10.1152/japplphysiol.00991.2014
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ricci Hannah, Rebecca Louise Stannard, Claire Minshull, Guilherme Giannini Artioli, Roger Charles Harris, Craig Sale, Hannah R, Stannard RL, Minshull C, Artioli GG, Harris RC, Sale C

Abstract

β-alanine (BA) supplementation improves human exercise performance. One possible explanation for this is an enhancement of muscle contractile properties, occurring via elevated intramuscular carnosine resulting in improved calcium sensitivity and handling. This study investigated the effect of BA supplementation on in vivo contractile properties and voluntary neuromuscular performance.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 73 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 3%
Unknown 35 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 7 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 14%
Student > Bachelor 3 8%
Other 2 6%
Student > Postgraduate 2 6%
Other 5 14%
Unknown 12 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 22%
Sports and Recreations 7 19%
Social Sciences 3 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 6%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 12 33%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 48. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 May 2017.
All research outputs
#172,711
of 7,849,765 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Applied Physiology
#150
of 3,386 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,955
of 237,164 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Applied Physiology
#10
of 64 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 7,849,765 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,386 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 237,164 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 64 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.