↓ Skip to main content

Detecting an Overall Survival Benefit that Is Derived From Progression-Free Survival

Overview of attention for article published in JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute, November 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
325 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
117 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Detecting an Overall Survival Benefit that Is Derived From Progression-Free Survival
Published in
JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute, November 2009
DOI 10.1093/jnci/djp369
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kristine R. Broglio, Donald A. Berry

Abstract

Whether progression-free survival (PFS) or overall survival (OS) is the more appropriate endpoint in clinical trials of metastatic cancer is controversial. In some disease and treatment settings, an improvement in PFS does not result in an improved OS.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 117 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 5 4%
Spain 3 3%
United Kingdom 3 3%
Australia 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Unknown 102 87%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 35 30%
Other 21 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 11 9%
Unspecified 10 9%
Other 27 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 64 55%
Unspecified 20 17%
Mathematics 14 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 5%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3 3%
Other 10 9%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 November 2017.
All research outputs
#3,968,358
of 13,847,008 outputs
Outputs from JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute
#3,017
of 6,469 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#79,417
of 296,476 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute
#50
of 110 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,847,008 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,469 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 296,476 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 110 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.