↓ Skip to main content

In situ cultivation of previously uncultivable microorganisms using the ichip

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Protocols, September 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
12 X users
patent
3 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
164 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
374 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
In situ cultivation of previously uncultivable microorganisms using the ichip
Published in
Nature Protocols, September 2017
DOI 10.1038/nprot.2017.074
Pubmed ID
Authors

Brittany Berdy, Amy L Spoering, Losee L Ling, Slava S Epstein

Abstract

Most microbial species remain uncultivated, and modifying artificial nutrient media brings only an incremental increase in cultivability. We reasoned that an alternative way to cultivate species with unknown requirements is to use naturally occurring combinations of growth factors. To achieve this, we moved cultivation into the microbes' natural habitat by placing cells taken from varying environmental samples into diffusion chambers, which are then returned to nature for incubation. By miniaturizing the chambers and placing only one to several cells into each chamber, we can grow and isolate microorganisms in axenic culture in one step. We call this cultivation platform the 'isolation chip', or 'ichip'. This platform has been shown to increase microbial recovery from 5- to 300-fold, depending on the study. Furthermore, it provides access to a unique set of microbes that are inaccessible by standard cultivation. Here we provide a simple protocol for building and applying ichips for environmental cultivation of soil bacteria as an example; the protocol consists of (i) preparing the ichip; (ii) collecting an environmental sample; (iii) serially diluting cells and loading them into the ichip; (iv) returning the ichip to the environment for incubation; (v) retrieving the ichip and harvesting grown material; and (vi) domestication of the ichip-derived colonies for growth in the laboratory. The ichip's full assembly and deployment is a relatively simple procedure that, with experience, takes ∼2-3 h. After in situ incubation, retrieval of the ichip and processing of its contents will take ∼1-4 h, depending on which specific procedures are used.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 374 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 374 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 67 18%
Student > Bachelor 60 16%
Researcher 49 13%
Student > Master 46 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 21 6%
Other 48 13%
Unknown 83 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 85 23%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 85 23%
Immunology and Microbiology 25 7%
Environmental Science 19 5%
Engineering 18 5%
Other 43 11%
Unknown 99 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 February 2024.
All research outputs
#1,627,387
of 25,440,205 outputs
Outputs from Nature Protocols
#546
of 2,945 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,903
of 329,569 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Protocols
#8
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,440,205 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,945 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 329,569 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.