↓ Skip to main content

Continuous Radar Tracking Illustrates the Development of Multi-destination Routes of Bumblebees

Overview of attention for article published in Scientific Reports, December 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
8 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
134 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
49 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
103 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Continuous Radar Tracking Illustrates the Development of Multi-destination Routes of Bumblebees
Published in
Scientific Reports, December 2017
DOI 10.1038/s41598-017-17553-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Joseph L. Woodgate, James C. Makinson, Ka S. Lim, Andrew M. Reynolds, Lars Chittka

Abstract

Animals that visit multiple foraging sites face a problem, analogous to the Travelling Salesman Problem, of finding an efficient route. We explored bumblebees' route development on an array of five artificial flowers in which minimising travel distances between individual feeders conflicted with minimising overall distance. No previous study of bee spatial navigation has been able to follow animals' movement during learning; we tracked bumblebee foragers continuously, using harmonic radar, and examined the process of route formation in detail for a small number of selected individuals. On our array, bees did not settle on visit sequences that gave the shortest overall path, but prioritised movements to nearby feeders. Nonetheless, flight distance and duration reduced with experience. This increased efficiency was attributable mainly to experienced bees reducing exploration beyond the feeder array and flights becoming straighter with experience, rather than improvements in the sequence of feeder visits. Flight paths of all legs of a flight stabilised at similar rates, whereas the first few feeder visits became fixed early while bees continued to experiment with the order of later visits. Stabilising early sections of a route and prioritising travel between nearby destinations may reduce the search space, allowing rapid adoption of efficient routes.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 134 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 103 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 103 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 26%
Researcher 20 19%
Student > Master 11 11%
Student > Bachelor 9 9%
Professor 5 5%
Other 14 14%
Unknown 17 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 46 45%
Environmental Science 8 8%
Neuroscience 6 6%
Computer Science 5 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 3%
Other 15 15%
Unknown 20 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 149. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 January 2023.
All research outputs
#280,265
of 25,728,350 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#3,245
of 142,656 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,127
of 447,283 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#99
of 4,232 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,728,350 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 142,656 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 447,283 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,232 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.