You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Prevalência de utilização de serviços de saúde no Brasil: revisão sistemática e metanálise
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Epidemiologia e Serviços de Saúde, July 2017
|
| DOI | 10.5123/s1679-49742017000300016 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Maria Elizete de Almeida Araújo, Marcus Tolentino Silva, Keitty Regina Cordeiro de Andrade, Taís Freire Galvão, Maurício Gomes Pereira, Maria Elizete de Almeida Araújo, Marcus Tolentino Silva, Keitty Regina Cordeiro de Andrade, Taís Freire Galvão, Maurício Gomes Pereira |
| Abstract |
to analyze the prevalence of use of health services in Brazil. systematic review and meta-analysis of population-based cross-sectional studies; MEDLINE, EMBASE, other sources, and microdata of surveys were searched; two researchers selected the studies, extracted the data and assessed methodological quality to include in the meta-analysis. from 1,979 retrieved references, 27 studies were included; the prevalence of medical visits in the previous year was 71% (confidence interval of 95% [95%CI] = 69; 73%; I2=99%); the proportion of women in each study (p=0.001; R2=25%) and the recall period (p>0.001; R2= 72%) contributed to the heterogeneity; prevalence of dental consultation was 37% (95%CI = 32; 42%; I2=100%), and of hospitalization, 10% (95%CI = 9; 11%; I2=98%), in the last year. more than half of the population had at least one medical visit, about one-third had a dental consultation and a tenth was hospitalized in the previous year. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 42 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 12 | 29% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 7% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 15 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 31% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 14% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 2% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 2% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 7% |
| Unknown | 17 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 December 2017.
All research outputs
#16,051,091
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Epidemiologia e Serviços de Saúde
#176
of 411 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#186,278
of 326,871 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Epidemiologia e Serviços de Saúde
#10
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 411 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 326,871 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.