↓ Skip to main content

Prevalência de utilização de serviços de saúde no Brasil: revisão sistemática e metanálise*

Overview of attention for article published in Epidemiologia e Serviços de Saúde, July 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
35 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Prevalência de utilização de serviços de saúde no Brasil: revisão sistemática e metanálise*
Published in
Epidemiologia e Serviços de Saúde, July 2017
DOI 10.5123/s1679-49742017000300016
Pubmed ID
Authors

Maria Elizete de Almeida Araújo, Marcus Tolentino Silva, Keitty Regina Cordeiro de Andrade, Taís Freire Galvão, Maurício Gomes Pereira, Maria Elizete de Almeida Araújo, Marcus Tolentino Silva, Keitty Regina Cordeiro de Andrade, Taís Freire Galvão, Maurício Gomes Pereira

Abstract

to analyze the prevalence of use of health services in Brazil. systematic review and meta-analysis of population-based cross-sectional studies; MEDLINE, EMBASE, other sources, and microdata of surveys were searched; two researchers selected the studies, extracted the data and assessed methodological quality to include in the meta-analysis. from 1,979 retrieved references, 27 studies were included; the prevalence of medical visits in the previous year was 71% (confidence interval of 95% [95%CI] = 69; 73%; I2=99%); the proportion of women in each study (p=0.001; R2=25%) and the recall period (p>0.001; R2= 72%) contributed to the heterogeneity; prevalence of dental consultation was 37% (95%CI = 32; 42%; I2=100%), and of hospitalization, 10% (95%CI = 9; 11%; I2=98%), in the last year. more than half of the population had at least one medical visit, about one-third had a dental consultation and a tenth was hospitalized in the previous year.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 35 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 9 26%
Student > Bachelor 7 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 9%
Student > Postgraduate 2 6%
Professor 1 3%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 11 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 34%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Environmental Science 1 3%
Sports and Recreations 1 3%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 14 40%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 December 2017.
All research outputs
#9,185,875
of 15,650,802 outputs
Outputs from Epidemiologia e Serviços de Saúde
#54
of 252 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#200,973
of 408,462 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Epidemiologia e Serviços de Saúde
#3
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,650,802 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 252 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 408,462 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.