| Title |
Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Systematic Reviews, January 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1186/2046-4053-4-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
David Moher, Larissa Shamseer, Mike Clarke, Davina Ghersi, Alessandro Liberati, Mark Petticrew, Paul Shekelle, Lesley A Stewart, PRISMA-P Group |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 292 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 59 | 20% |
| Canada | 33 | 11% |
| Spain | 19 | 7% |
| United States | 19 | 7% |
| Australia | 7 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 5 | 2% |
| Ireland | 5 | 2% |
| India | 4 | 1% |
| Finland | 4 | 1% |
| Other | 30 | 10% |
| Unknown | 107 | 37% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 160 | 55% |
| Scientists | 68 | 23% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 44 | 15% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 18 | 6% |
| Unknown | 2 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12,176 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 18 | <1% |
| United States | 13 | <1% |
| Spain | 7 | <1% |
| Portugal | 6 | <1% |
| Brazil | 6 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 5 | <1% |
| Australia | 5 | <1% |
| South Africa | 3 | <1% |
| Canada | 3 | <1% |
| Other | 32 | <1% |
| Unknown | 12078 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 1949 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1522 | 13% |
| Researcher | 1134 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1108 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 769 | 6% |
| Other | 2308 | 19% |
| Unknown | 3386 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2534 | 21% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1130 | 9% |
| Psychology | 815 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 556 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 402 | 3% |
| Other | 2777 | 23% |
| Unknown | 3962 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 281. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 February 2024.
All research outputs
#128,538
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Systematic Reviews
#10
of 2,251 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,318
of 365,327 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Systematic Reviews
#2
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,251 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 365,327 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.