Things that make me think, #50044 : 'only a third of the variation in cancer risk among tissues is attributable to environmental factors or inherited predispositions, the majority is due to “bad luck”' - https://t.co/rn7Q8yIfVc
In 2015, the “bad luck” hypothesis, whereby the incidence of a #cancer is correlated to the number of cell divisions, was put forward. Now, Tomasetti explains the correlation between #obesity & cancer by the same mechanism. https://t.co/0KqtXJllTE ht
RT @LaurelCoons: Cancer Is Caused By DNA Mutations: 🧬Bad luck plays larger role than environmental, genetic factors in determining who get…
Two scientific interpretations of SEER: 1- The vast majority of cancers are due to bad luck (The eminent Prof. B. Vogelstein). https://t.co/WEfXJVKAMg versus 2- All cancers are caused by intracellular accumulations of unrecycled micro-residues. https://
RT @sciencemagazine: Chance errors during stem cell division explain more #cancers than genetic or enviro factors http://t.co/h7sm3dVYRi ht…
RT @sciencemagazine: Chance errors during stem cell division explain more #cancers than genetic or enviro factors http://t.co/h7sm3dVYRi ht…
RT @sciencemagazine: Chance errors during stem cell division explain more #cancers than genetic or enviro factors http://t.co/h7sm3dVYRi ht…
RT @sciencemagazine: Chance errors during stem cell division explain more #cancers than genetic or enviro factors http://t.co/h7sm3dVYRi ht…
Variation in cancer risk among tissues can be explained by the number of stem cell divisions https://t.co/DqoxsSubAH La preuve que: Le but des lobbyistes: Fumez, buvez, mangez n´importe quoi..…etc, les cancers sont dus à de la malchance.
Variation in cancer risk among tissues can be explained by the number of stem cell divisions https://t.co/DqoxsSubAH Evidence that: The goal of lobbyists and their scientific advocacy groups: Smoke, drink, eat anything.... ... etc, cancers are due to bad l
1-The vast majority of cancers are due to bad luck (The eminent Prof. B. Vogelstein) https://t.co/DqoxsSubAH versus 2-All cancers are caused by intracellular accumulations of unrecycled micro-residues. (https://t.co/mL9ukN1Mdl)
@zehjoseh Cancer em paciente jovem levanta a suspeita de um componente genetico. Mas nem sempre se encontra. As vezes é só MUITO (MAS MUITO) AZAR mesmo. https://t.co/7KglUnFfMx
World is based on an approximation.
@pdsutter @UniversalAcid @mboudry @milachka2001 @drWouterArrazol En volgens een artikel in Science stelt dat slechts 1/3 van de kankers kan toegeschreven worden aan omgevingsfactoren of erfelijke factoren ..Zoals altijd met bron .. https://t.co/OC2zT5q2lL
RT @IlindelatorreMD: Solo un tercio de los cánceres son atribuibles a factores ambientales o predisposiciones heredadas; la gran mayoría es…
RT @IlindelatorreMD: Solo un tercio de los cánceres son atribuibles a factores ambientales o predisposiciones heredadas; la gran mayoría es…
Solo un tercio de los cánceres son atribuibles a factores ambientales o predisposiciones heredadas; la gran mayoría es el resultado de las mutaciones aleatorias que pueden ocurrir cuando el ADN se replica en células normales no cancerosas. https://t.co/6G
RT @amadorpriede: @Guanan_ También tenemos que tener en cuenta que un importante número de cánceres se producen como consecuencia de proces…
@beeblebubbz this https://t.co/HT85djpCQp and the follow up https://t.co/uuIDsKsJVF just for the sheer controversy
@RiganoESQ this wish/target 'dont treat cancer, but never get it' unfortunately cannot really be articulated in a scientifically motivated way since the 'bad luck' paper of Tomasetti & Vogelstein, primary prevention does not seem to be workable option
@Guanan_ También tenemos que tener en cuenta que un importante número de cánceres se producen como consecuencia de procesos estocásticos durante la división celular. https://t.co/SIq864HbL0
Tax bad luck to help the poor avoid #cancer.
Something has to trigger the DNA mutations, they're not all spontaneous and random, statistically speaking. Nature is more ordered.
Variation in cancer risk among tissues can be explained by the number of stem cell divisions | Science https://t.co/3QeQZ5wlNa
RT @LaurelCoons: Cancer Is Caused By DNA Mutations: 🧬Bad luck plays larger role than environmental, genetic factors in determining who get…
Which cells divide the most? Cells exposed to the external environment need to divide more (because they are exposed to more damage) - think your skin, GI tract. And the tissues whose cells divide more have a higher likelihood of developing cancer. http
Biology trivia fact: the probability of getting cancer in a particular tissue is in large part explained by just considering the number of cell divisions of that tissue (correlation of 80%) 🧫 https://t.co/4a45Pnfcii
Numbers of stem cell divisions dictate cancer risk https://t.co/3lWWnyqNrQ
@coldethyl2 https://t.co/LOKVHfO8X9 According to this seminal paper by Cristian Tomasetti and Bert Vogelstein “bad luck” component explains a far greater number of cancers than do hereditary and environmental factors.
@travis_statham Read up: random errors occurring during replication in normal stem cells are a major contributing factor in cancer development. Remarkably, this “bad luck” component explains a far greater number of cancers than do hereditary and environmen
Below👇🏻 interesting paper! (Cc @pnutsings )
@marklewismd this is the philosophical message contained in Vogelstein’s “Bad Luck” paper, and is the underlying reason for much of the blowback. https://t.co/vawexthuEo
Very interesting piece that puts cancer in the context of evolution: https://t.co/AdNBDDndoT I wonder when it will be possible with tissue culture to look at cancer evolution in-vitro?
@DMGrayMD @NCCRTnews @GYRIG @CCAlliance @BlueHats4colons @AliveAndKicknDD As a survivor, I believe discussions about causality should extend beyond heritable and environmental factors. Deeply appreciative of all efforts dedicated to these questions. https
RT @LaurelCoons: Bad Luck Plays Larger Role Than Environmental Factors Or Heredity In Determining Who Gets Cancer: Two-thirds of adult can…
RT @LaurelCoons: Bad Luck Plays Larger Role Than Environmental Factors Or Heredity In Determining Who Gets Cancer: Two-thirds of adult can…
#genomics #ngs Variation in cancer risk among tissues can be explained by the number of stem cell divisions | Science https://t.co/nUfFh45aCY, see more https://t.co/U7scMFApc9
Claiming that bad luck causes cancer is not an explanation
RT @LaurelCoons: Bad Luck Plays Larger Role Than Environmental Factors Or Heredity In Determining Who Gets Cancer: Two-thirds of adult can…
RT @LaurelCoons: Bad Luck Plays Larger Role Than Environmental Factors Or Heredity In Determining Who Gets Cancer: Two-thirds of adult can…
RT @LaurelCoons: Bad Luck Plays Larger Role Than Environmental Factors Or Heredity In Determining Who Gets Cancer: Two-thirds of adult can…
RT @LaurelCoons: Bad Luck Plays Larger Role Than Environmental Factors Or Heredity In Determining Who Gets Cancer: Two-thirds of adult can…
RT @LaurelCoons: Bad Luck Plays Larger Role Than Environmental Factors Or Heredity In Determining Who Gets Cancer: Two-thirds of adult can…
https://t.co/56s7EFsBEm Christian Tomasetti will be speaking at our Annual Meeting #RRS2018
@KeithRees3 @kytart @Jessica_Sarah_G @RBMonte @CHyGirl86 @L337ish Peer reviewed: https://t.co/P9TmPb3X8r https://t.co/jx8BPHYl7M https://t.co/1tvv2HraaD -Jeffrey Tomkins, PhD in genetics from Clemson U. https://t.co/lQf6UIirPT https://t.co/z9FJTOLIfx http
RT @LaurelCoons: Bad Luck Plays Larger Role Than Environmental Factors or Heredity In Determining Who Gets Cancer: 📌Two-thirds of adult ca…
RT @LaurelCoons: Bad Luck Plays Larger Role Than Environmental Factors or Heredity In Determining Who Gets Cancer: 📌Two-thirds of adult ca…
RT @LaurelCoons: Bad Luck Plays Larger Role Than Environmental Factors or Heredity In Determining Who Gets Cancer: 📌Two-thirds of adult ca…
RT @LaurelCoons: Bad Luck Plays Larger Role Than Environmental Factors or Heredity In Determining Who Gets Cancer: 📌Two-thirds of adult ca…
RT @LaurelCoons: Bad Luck Plays Larger Role Than Environmental Factors or Heredity In Determining Who Gets Cancer: 📌Two-thirds of adult ca…
@rinascita92 @raquelgarciade2 @Luz_y_Sombras @gloria_serra @EqInvestigacion El enfoque de la 'mala suerte' (Tomasetti y Vogelstein, https://t.co/QxNodumxGX), pero en esa tómbola perversa llevas más papeletas fumando.
Kanker als 'entropische pech'. Want er is nou eenmaal veel meer kans op wanordelijke celdeling is dan op ordelijke https://t.co/xhPRLJ5rrb
Variation in cancer risk among tissues can be explained by the number of stem cell divisions https://t.co/qjl9cQQvL2
Variation in cancer risk among tissues can be explained by the number of stem cell divisions https://t.co/zwTiayXzsa
RT @DrWestinForTX07: .@RepMoBrooks @HouseGOP @CongCulberson Most cancers are caused by chance - fact. My patients did nothing wrong, but th…
.@RepMoBrooks @HouseGOP @CongCulberson Most cancers are caused by chance - fact. My patients did nothing wrong, but they will be hurt badly by AHCA. https://t.co/kJE5yFa3OK
But 2/3 of the time a person gets #cancer due to bad luck. (Tomasetti & Vogelstein, 2015: https://t.co/tdvS95Y1SK)
Variaciones en el riesgo de #cáncer en los tejidos pudiera explicarse por el N° de divisiones en sus células madre. https://t.co/5GyBtqByxS
Nelson: Per cell division, about 5-10 bases are mutated per cell division. Shows figure from '15 ref https://t.co/kr7LxPDSBv #AACR17
6割以上のがんはDNAコピーエラー、防げない? https://t.co/iU77f20FrP https://t.co/6UTvFxp0jT 外因性リスク因子 https://t.co/MxrZh2E1X0
RT @andresgpalomo: La "bad luck" es la causa mas frecuente de cáncer. https://t.co/Yk3gr7ydk7
Variation in cancer risk among tissues can be explained by the number of stem cell divisions | Science - https://t.co/VpX7XFqopT
RT @andresgpalomo: La "bad luck" es la causa mas frecuente de cáncer. https://t.co/Yk3gr7ydk7
La "bad luck" es la causa mas frecuente de cáncer. https://t.co/Yk3gr7ydk7
Variation in cancer risk among tissues can be explained by the number of stem cell divisions https://t.co/S2SjgaERlE https://t.co/afA9NFWwfU
Variation in cancer risk among tissues can be explained by the number of stem cell divisions https://t.co/3MGrSuKzRv
@PabloHerreros @JulioBasulto_DN @juan_revenga @carloscasabona @SinAzucarOrg Johns Hopkins University? https://t.co/2oNLYgEFwl
Cancer is just "bad luck," study suggests. Seems to focus on environmental mutagens ... what about allostatic load? https://t.co/cKpIYocZXm
Discussion on "bad luck" cancer gets follow-up https://t.co/MM2UboH9iq Will be discussed at #AACR17 ?
RT @evt_shaazgai: @Batbayar_0 Уучлаарай typo алдаа гарсан байна. 2/3 буюу 66% шүү. Thanks pointing it out. https://t.co/FQw0ZVwGpt
@Batbayar_0 Уучлаарай typo алдаа гарсан байна. 2/3 буюу 66% шүү. Thanks pointing it out. https://t.co/FQw0ZVwGpt
Here is ours https://t.co/UwCazpzDex Don't ask me why I'm only realizing this now. 🇺🇸🦑🇺🇸 https://t.co/cCcbmfnDqg
Heh, something I helped write as a med student had been cited by a Science article (supplement, but still) https://t.co/M6HLUbi6F2
RT @sebastianofil: Variation in cancer risk among tissues can be explained by the number of stem cell divisions https://t.co/cqoTZscusQ
Variation in cancer risk among tissues can be explained by the number of stem cell divisions https://t.co/cqoTZscusQ
Variation in #CancerRisk among tissues can be explained by the number of #StemCell divisions https://t.co/XTPka4qYG5 | via @sciencemagazine
RT @corrie_painter: @stales is it 'some' bad luck? https://t.co/dyCLJiDqMY #bcsm
@stales is it 'some' bad luck? https://t.co/dyCLJiDqMY #bcsm
RT @cacecar: Helpless to Prevent #Cancer...? https://t.co/Rwhnu6ra6S; studies: https://t.co/zmFMSssX7D; https://t.co/KMWNn9JBDI; https://t.…
RT @cacecar: Helpless to Prevent #Cancer...? https://t.co/Rwhnu6ra6S; studies: https://t.co/zmFMSssX7D; https://t.co/KMWNn9JBDI; https://t.…
Helpless to Prevent #Cancer...? https://t.co/Rwhnu6ra6S; studies: https://t.co/zmFMSssX7D; https://t.co/KMWNn9JBDI; https://t.co/OmJCmbVK1R
@RebeccaSkloot The 'cancer is mostly bad luck' stories all came from this paper - https://t.co/1Nt2MLzNxS (1/2)
Controversy: The majority of #cancer due to “bad luck" . Intrinsic factors main cause @sciencemagazine https://t.co/XfmX6y0TjJ
RT @RogueRad: Is cancer due to nature https://t.co/fp9RaTYOWF or nurture https://t.co/KtIjFXJoZi? Geneticists acting like economists (on th…
Is cancer due to nature https://t.co/fp9RaTYOWF or nurture https://t.co/KtIjFXJoZi? Geneticists acting like economists (on the one hand...)
環境要因または継承素因に起因することを示唆しています。大部分は、通常の、非癌性幹細胞におけるDNA複製の間に生じるランダムな突然変異である「不運」に起因するものです。 https://t.co/Qv9vzEOeli
なぜ癌ができやすい組織とできにくい組織があるのか?百年の問題に解答:Johns-Hopkins Medicine。 https://t.co/0YRMtq2ve5
RT @DanGraur: "Nature" versus "nurture" in the etiology of cancer. Opposing views. https://t.co/9qYRGyZqGf https://t.co/jDmNTnWNjq https://…
"Nature" versus "nurture" in the etiology of cancer. Opposing views. https://t.co/9qYRGyZqGf https://t.co/jDmNTnWNjq https://t.co/k3Pa7w3Nuz
@BX_Protocol No source of data mentioned on your neat infographic :¬( .This one is from ... https://t.co/qk0kPpo97i https://t.co/lGb1C6aXg3
@AriBFriedman something to mix medicine and stats. http://t.co/8p2uPGlZet
RT @AgingCell: Lifetime risk of cancers determined primarily by total number of stem cell divisions. http://t.co/X4NztI3u1e
因みに、今年初めにScienceに掲載された論文(Stem cellの分裂回数∝がんリスクで、アブストでは“bad luck”とか書かれている) http://t.co/3eJysOlNKg に対しては、批判も結構あるらしい。 http://t.co/plPCUdJY33
RT @borjasas: .@MiguelJaraBlog | @JuanGrvas | Padecer Cáncer es cosa de "Mala Suerte" | http://t.co/WQYixrvWfX | http://t.co/n4iDnhOz8e