↓ Skip to main content

U.S. Geological Survey National Strong-Motion Project Strategic Plan, 2017–22

Overview of attention for article published in US Geological Survey, January 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
U.S. Geological Survey National Strong-Motion Project Strategic Plan, 2017–22
Published in
US Geological Survey, January 2017
DOI 10.3133/ofr20171156
Authors

Aagaard, Brad, Celebi, Mehmet, Gee, Lind, Graves, Robert, Jaiswal, Kishor, Kalkan, Erol, Knudsen, Keith L., Luco, Nicolas, Smith, James, Steidl, Jamison, Stephens, Christopher D.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 2 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 50%
Unknown 1 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 1 50%
Unknown 1 50%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 December 2017.
All research outputs
#9,814,320
of 12,287,089 outputs
Outputs from US Geological Survey
#1,204
of 1,421 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#246,127
of 344,788 outputs
Outputs of similar age from US Geological Survey
#91
of 109 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,287,089 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,421 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 344,788 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 109 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.