You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A review on the numerical simulation of equatorial plasma bubbles toward scintillation evaluation and forecasting
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Progress in Earth and Planetary Science, December 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s40645-017-0153-6 |
| Authors |
Tatsuhiro Yokoyama |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 1 | 50% |
| Japan | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 70 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 70 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 26% |
| Researcher | 14 | 20% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 7% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 4% |
| Professor | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 6 | 9% |
| Unknown | 22 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Physics and Astronomy | 19 | 27% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 16 | 23% |
| Engineering | 8 | 11% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 3% |
| Mathematics | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 2 | 3% |
| Unknown | 22 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 January 2024.
All research outputs
#15,592,063
of 25,159,758 outputs
Outputs from Progress in Earth and Planetary Science
#302
of 584 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#243,690
of 451,654 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Progress in Earth and Planetary Science
#7
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,159,758 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 584 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 451,654 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.