↓ Skip to main content

A review on the numerical simulation of equatorial plasma bubbles toward scintillation evaluation and forecasting

Overview of attention for article published in Progress in Earth and Planetary Science, December 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
29 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A review on the numerical simulation of equatorial plasma bubbles toward scintillation evaluation and forecasting
Published in
Progress in Earth and Planetary Science, December 2017
DOI 10.1186/s40645-017-0153-6
Authors

Tatsuhiro Yokoyama

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 29 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 38%
Researcher 4 14%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 7%
Student > Bachelor 1 3%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 3%
Other 3 10%
Unknown 7 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 7 24%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 7 24%
Engineering 5 17%
Computer Science 1 3%
Sports and Recreations 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 7 24%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 December 2017.
All research outputs
#9,423,229
of 12,292,436 outputs
Outputs from Progress in Earth and Planetary Science
#157
of 228 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#225,199
of 344,916 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Progress in Earth and Planetary Science
#15
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,292,436 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 228 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 344,916 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.