↓ Skip to main content

Iron therapy in anaemic adults without chronic kidney disease

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
19 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
30 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
209 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Iron therapy in anaemic adults without chronic kidney disease
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd010640.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kurinchi Selvan Gurusamy, Myura Nagendran, Jack F Broadhurst, Stefan D Anker, Toby Richards

Abstract

Anaemia affects about a quarter of the world's population. An estimated 50% of anaemic people have anaemia due to iron deficiency.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 209 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Chile 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Poland 1 <1%
Unknown 204 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 43 21%
Researcher 25 12%
Student > Bachelor 23 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 11%
Other 17 8%
Other 37 18%
Unknown 41 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 97 46%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 7%
Psychology 11 5%
Social Sciences 7 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 2%
Other 23 11%
Unknown 51 24%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 January 2015.
All research outputs
#1,998,254
of 15,487,101 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,686
of 11,201 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,725
of 304,298 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#128
of 244 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,487,101 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,201 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 304,298 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 244 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.