↓ Skip to main content

Community wide interventions for increasing physical activity

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
135 tweeters
facebook
15 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
79 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
57 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Community wide interventions for increasing physical activity
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2015
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008366.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Philip RA Baker, Daniel P Francis, Jesus Soares, Alison L Weightman, Charles Foster

Abstract

Multi-strategic community wide interventions for physical activity are increasingly popular but their ability to achieve population level improvements is unknown.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 135 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 57 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 1 2%
Student > Master 1 2%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 2%
Researcher 1 2%
Unknown 53 93%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 1 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Social Sciences 1 2%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 2%
Unknown 53 93%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 106. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 February 2019.
All research outputs
#151,161
of 13,628,470 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#331
of 10,687 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,429
of 295,295 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#10
of 249 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,628,470 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,687 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 295,295 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 249 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.