You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Complexity of the deep San Andreas Fault zone defined by cascading tremor
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Geoscience, January 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1038/ngeo2335 |
| Authors |
David R. Shelly |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 20% |
| United States | 2 | 10% |
| Canada | 1 | 5% |
| Brazil | 1 | 5% |
| Greece | 1 | 5% |
| Spain | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 10 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 16 | 80% |
| Scientists | 3 | 15% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 88 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| Japan | 1 | 1% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 1% |
| Germany | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 84 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 33 | 38% |
| Researcher | 15 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 14 | 16% |
| Unknown | 11 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 62 | 70% |
| Engineering | 2 | 2% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 1% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 1% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 3 | 3% |
| Unknown | 18 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 January 2015.
All research outputs
#2,369,338
of 24,147,581 outputs
Outputs from Nature Geoscience
#1,999
of 3,219 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,289
of 360,669 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Geoscience
#35
of 61 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,147,581 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,219 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 102.1. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 360,669 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 61 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.