↓ Skip to main content

The Serengeti strategy: How special interests try to intimidate scientists, and how best to fight back

Overview of attention for article published in Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, November 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#8 of 1,251)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
13 news outlets
book_reviews
1 book reviewer
blogs
11 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
557 X users
facebook
72 Facebook pages
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
15 Google+ users
reddit
5 Redditors

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
40 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Serengeti strategy: How special interests try to intimidate scientists, and how best to fight back
Published in
Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, November 2015
DOI 10.1177/0096340214563674
Authors

Michael E. Mann

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 557 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 3%
United States 1 3%
Germany 1 3%
Unknown 37 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 8 20%
Student > Master 7 18%
Other 5 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 13%
Researcher 4 10%
Other 7 18%
Unknown 4 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 7 18%
Environmental Science 6 15%
Social Sciences 4 10%
Engineering 4 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 10%
Other 10 25%
Unknown 5 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 597. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 November 2023.
All research outputs
#39,130
of 25,765,370 outputs
Outputs from Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists
#8
of 1,251 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#415
of 396,640 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists
#2
of 319 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,765,370 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,251 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 28.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 396,640 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 319 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.