↓ Skip to main content

Ethnoecology of the palm Brahea dulcis (Kunth) Mart. in central Mexico

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
61 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
68 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Ethnoecology of the palm Brahea dulcis (Kunth) Mart. in central Mexico
Published in
Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine, January 2015
DOI 10.1186/1746-4269-11-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

María T Pulido, Mayte Coronel-Ortega

Abstract

There have been few studies on the sustainable use of non-timber forest products in arid and semi-arid zones. The palm Brahea dulcis has been one of the most important resources in semi-arid Mesoamerica, since pre-Hispanic times. Currently, some populations grow within protected natural areas, representing both a challenge and an opportunity for local development.This ethnoecological study of B. dulcis in central Mexico aimed to evaluate their uses, harvesting context, and potential for exploitation, in order to give practical advice on their best use and management.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 68 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
Unknown 67 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 12 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 16%
Researcher 10 15%
Student > Bachelor 7 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 7%
Other 12 18%
Unknown 11 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 28 41%
Environmental Science 9 13%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 5 7%
Arts and Humanities 3 4%
Social Sciences 3 4%
Other 8 12%
Unknown 12 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 June 2015.
All research outputs
#17,736,409
of 22,776,824 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine
#596
of 733 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#241,558
of 352,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine
#12
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,776,824 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 733 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,499 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.