↓ Skip to main content

Follow-up strategies after treatment (large loop excision of the transformation zone (LLETZ)) for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN): Impact of human papillomavirus (HPV) test

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
7 tweeters
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
31 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
139 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Follow-up strategies after treatment (large loop excision of the transformation zone (LLETZ)) for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN): Impact of human papillomavirus (HPV) test
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2015
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd010757.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Esther van der Heijden, Alberto D Lopes, Andrew Bryant, Ruud Bekkers, Khadra Galaal

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 139 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 137 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 21 15%
Student > Master 17 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 12%
Researcher 14 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 9%
Other 30 22%
Unknown 29 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 58 42%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 4%
Psychology 5 4%
Computer Science 4 3%
Other 22 16%
Unknown 30 22%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 June 2020.
All research outputs
#3,259,560
of 16,403,241 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,052
of 11,502 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#60,734
of 308,293 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#154
of 247 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,403,241 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,502 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.2. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 308,293 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 247 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.