↓ Skip to main content

What are ‘Integrated Landscape Approaches’ and how effectively have they been implemented in the tropics: a systematic map protocol

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Evidence, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#34 of 330)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
2 blogs
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
11 X users
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
121 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
342 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
What are ‘Integrated Landscape Approaches’ and how effectively have they been implemented in the tropics: a systematic map protocol
Published in
Environmental Evidence, January 2015
DOI 10.1186/2047-2382-4-2
Authors

James Reed, Liz Deakin, Terry Sunderland

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 342 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Colombia 2 <1%
Netherlands 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Ghana 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 334 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 74 22%
Student > Master 63 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 56 16%
Other 20 6%
Student > Bachelor 20 6%
Other 44 13%
Unknown 65 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 117 34%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 62 18%
Social Sciences 43 13%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 9 3%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 7 2%
Other 25 7%
Unknown 79 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 35. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 July 2022.
All research outputs
#1,144,760
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Evidence
#34
of 330 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,881
of 359,070 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Evidence
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 330 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 359,070 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them