↓ Skip to main content

What are ‘Integrated Landscape Approaches’ and how effectively have they been implemented in the tropics: a systematic map protocol

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Evidence, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
12 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
42 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
194 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
What are ‘Integrated Landscape Approaches’ and how effectively have they been implemented in the tropics: a systematic map protocol
Published in
Environmental Evidence, January 2015
DOI 10.1186/2047-2382-4-2
Authors

James Reed, Liz Deakin, Terry Sunderland

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 194 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Colombia 2 1%
Netherlands 2 1%
United Kingdom 2 1%
Ghana 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 186 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 55 28%
Student > Master 36 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 36 19%
Student > Bachelor 14 7%
Other 13 7%
Other 25 13%
Unknown 15 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 82 42%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 40 21%
Social Sciences 27 14%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 5 3%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 5 3%
Other 10 5%
Unknown 25 13%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 August 2016.
All research outputs
#1,074,788
of 13,568,961 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Evidence
#53
of 186 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,888
of 295,126 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Evidence
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,568,961 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 186 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 295,126 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.