You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
101 Innovations in Scholarly Communication - the Changing Research Workflow
|
|---|---|
| Published on |
figshare, January 2015
|
| DOI | 10.6084/m9.figshare.1286826 |
| Authors |
Bianca Kramer, Jeroen Bosman, Bianca, Kramer, Jeroen, Bosman, Kramer, Bianca, Bosman, Jeroen |
| Abstract |
Poster presented at Force 2015 https://www.force11.org/meetings/force2015 In the fast developing world of scholarly communication it is good to take a step back and look at the patterns and processes of innovation in this field. To this end, we have selected 101 innovations (in the form of tools & sites) and graphically displayed them by year and also according to 6 phases of the research workflow: collection of data & literature, analysis, writing, publishing & archiving, outreach and assessment. This overview facilitates discussion on processes of innovation, disruption, diffusion, consolidation, competition and success, but also of failure and stagnation, over the last 3 decades. We describe some of the trends, expectations, uncertainties, opportunities and challenges within each of the workflow phases. Also, based on the graphical overview we present a juxtaposition of typical traditional, innovative and experimental workflows. Accompanying material (see links below) 1) Survey on real-world tool usage (open until Feb 2016) 2) Database of 400+ tools (Google Spreadsheet) 3) Database of 101 tools + workflows |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 457 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 58 | 13% |
| United States | 52 | 11% |
| Netherlands | 23 | 5% |
| Spain | 20 | 4% |
| France | 16 | 4% |
| Australia | 16 | 4% |
| Germany | 16 | 4% |
| Canada | 12 | 3% |
| Belgium | 7 | 2% |
| Other | 76 | 17% |
| Unknown | 161 | 35% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 318 | 70% |
| Scientists | 76 | 17% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 60 | 13% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | <1% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 395. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 November 2022.
All research outputs
#77,857
of 25,660,026 outputs
Outputs from figshare
#6
of 25,402 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#752
of 360,228 outputs
Outputs of similar age from figshare
#1
of 470 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,660,026 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 25,402 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 360,228 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 470 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.