101 Innovations in Scholarly Communication - the Changing Research Workflow

Overview of attention for research output published on figshare, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#2 of 9,728)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
7 blogs
twitter
558 tweeters
facebook
14 Facebook pages
googleplus
11 Google+ users
q&a
1 Q&A thread
Title
101 Innovations in Scholarly Communication - the Changing Research Workflow
Published on
figshare, January 2015
DOI 10.6084/m9.figshare.1286826
Authors

Bianca Kramer, Jeroen Bosman, Bianca, Kramer, Jeroen, Bosman

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 558 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 498. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 January 2017.
All research outputs
#6,037
of 7,206,813 outputs
Outputs from figshare
#2
of 9,728 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#260
of 231,601 outputs
Outputs of similar age from figshare
#1
of 520 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 7,206,813 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,728 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 231,601 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 520 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.