↓ Skip to main content

The discovery of Trypanosoma cruzi and Chagas disease (1908-1909): tropical medicine in Brazil

Overview of attention for article published in História, Ciências, Saúde-Manguinhos, July 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
9 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
44 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
43 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The discovery of Trypanosoma cruzi and Chagas disease (1908-1909): tropical medicine in Brazil
Published in
História, Ciências, Saúde-Manguinhos, July 2009
DOI 10.1590/s0104-59702009000500002
Pubmed ID
Authors

Simone Petraglia Kropf, Magali Romero Sá

Abstract

This article analyzes the discovery of Chagas disease and the parasite that causes it (Trypanosoma cruzi) by Carlos Chagas in 1908/1909, with a special focus on the scientific and social context in which this occurred. Its inclusion in the international debate on European tropical medicine--especially with researchers from the German school of protozoology--and its connection with discussions on the modernization of the recently established Brazilian Republic are also examined. The discovery of Chagas disease became a decisive aspect in the scientific project that Oswaldo Cruz sought to establish at the institute that bears his name. It was extolled as a symbol of Brazil's scientific ability t produce knowledge in line with the international scientific agenda, while simultaneously being attuned to the specific problems of the country.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 43 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 2 5%
Student > Bachelor 1 2%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 2%
Student > Master 1 2%
Unknown 38 88%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Arts and Humanities 1 2%
Environmental Science 1 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 2%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 38 88%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 August 2023.
All research outputs
#3,289,083
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from História, Ciências, Saúde-Manguinhos
#179
of 1,628 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,244
of 121,905 outputs
Outputs of similar age from História, Ciências, Saúde-Manguinhos
#2
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,628 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 121,905 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.