↓ Skip to main content

Communication skills intervention: promoting effective communication between nurses and mechanically ventilated patients

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Nursing, December 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
38 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
290 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Communication skills intervention: promoting effective communication between nurses and mechanically ventilated patients
Published in
BMC Nursing, December 2017
DOI 10.1186/s12912-017-0268-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

K. S. Dithole, Gloria Thupayagale-Tshweneagae, Oluwaseyi A. Akpor, Mary M. Moleki

Abstract

Patients in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) often experience communication difficulties - usually associated with mechanical ventilation - resulting in psychological problems such as anxiety, fear, and depression. Good communication between nurses and patients is critical for success from personalised nursing care of each patient. The purpose of this study is to describe nurses' experience of a communication skills training intervention. A convenience sample of twenty intensive care nurses participated in the study. Data was collected by means of interviews with nurses. Data from the interviews were analysed using qualitative thematic content analysis. Six themes emerged: (1) acceptance of knowledge and skills developed during workshops; (2) management support; (3) appreciation of augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) devices; (4) change in attitudes; and (5) the need to share knowledge with others and (6) inclusion of communication skills workshop training as an integral part of an orientation programme for all nurses. The findings of this study indicated that the application of augmentative and alternative communication devices and strategies can improve nurse-patient communication in intensive care units. Therefore, the implementation of communication skills training for intensive care nurses should constantly be encouraged and, indeed, introduced as a key element of ICU care training.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 290 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 290 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 51 18%
Student > Bachelor 34 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 6%
Other 11 4%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 3%
Other 37 13%
Unknown 131 45%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 84 29%
Medicine and Dentistry 27 9%
Social Sciences 9 3%
Unspecified 6 2%
Arts and Humanities 5 2%
Other 22 8%
Unknown 137 47%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 October 2018.
All research outputs
#6,758,642
of 22,880,230 outputs
Outputs from BMC Nursing
#214
of 752 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#133,925
of 438,607 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Nursing
#4
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,880,230 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 752 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 438,607 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.