↓ Skip to main content

Systematic Comparison of C3 and C4 Plants Based on Metabolic Network Analysis

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Systems Biology, December 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#45 of 1,132)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
3 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
109 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
521 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Systematic Comparison of C3 and C4 Plants Based on Metabolic Network Analysis
Published in
BMC Systems Biology, December 2012
DOI 10.1186/1752-0509-6-s2-s9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Chuanli Wang, Longyun Guo, Yixue Li, Zhuo Wang

Abstract

The C4 photosynthetic cycle supercharges photosynthesis by concentrating CO2 around ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase and significantly reduces the oxygenation reaction. Therefore engineering C4 feature into C3 plants has been suggested as a feasible way to increase photosynthesis and yield of C3 plants, such as rice, wheat, and potato. To identify the possible transition from C3 to C4 plants, the systematic comparison of C3 and C4 metabolism is necessary.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 521 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
South Africa 2 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Singapore 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 511 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 89 17%
Student > Master 72 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 61 12%
Researcher 54 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 26 5%
Other 62 12%
Unknown 157 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 178 34%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 55 11%
Environmental Science 31 6%
Engineering 14 3%
Chemical Engineering 13 2%
Other 62 12%
Unknown 168 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2024.
All research outputs
#2,260,565
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from BMC Systems Biology
#45
of 1,132 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,461
of 286,181 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Systems Biology
#1
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,132 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 286,181 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.