↓ Skip to main content

Clinical treatment considerations in the intensity‐modulated radiotherapy era for patients with N0‐category nasopharyngeal carcinoma and enlarged neck lymph nodes

Overview of attention for article published in Cancer Communications, March 2017
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
26 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Clinical treatment considerations in the intensity‐modulated radiotherapy era for patients with N0‐category nasopharyngeal carcinoma and enlarged neck lymph nodes
Published in
Cancer Communications, March 2017
DOI 10.1186/s40880-017-0199-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hao Peng, Lei Chen, Rui Guo, Yuan Zhang, Wen-Fei Li, Yan-Ping Mao, Ying Sun, Fan Zhang, Li-Zhi Liu, Li Tian, Jun Ma

Abstract

Nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) shows a high proportion of lymph node metastasis, and treatment guidelines have been developed for positive nodes. However, no irradiation guidelines have been proposed for patients with enlarged neck lymph nodes (ENLNs) that do not meet the radiological criteria of 10 mm in diameter for positive lymph nodes. This study aimed to determine the prognostic value and radiation dose for ENLNs in N0-category NPC patients treated with intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT). We reviewed the medical data of 251 patients with non-metastatic, N0-category NPC treated with IMRT. Receiver operating characteristic curves were used to calculate the cut-off value of the ENLN diameter for the prediction of disease failure. The biological equivalent dose (BED) for ENLNs was calculated. Patient survival was compared between the small and large ENLN groups. Independent prognostic factors were identified using the Cox proportional hazards model. The estimated 4-year regional relapse-free survival rate was higher in patients with ENLNs ≥5.5 mm than in those with ENLNs <5.5 mm (100% vs. 98.8%, P = 0.049), whereas disease-free, overall, and distant metastasis-free survival rates were similar between the two groups. After adjusting for various factors, ENLN diameter was not identified as an independent prognostic factor (P > 0.05 for all survival rates). In the subgroup analysis, patients receiving BED ≥72 Gy had a similar prognosis as patients receiving BED <72 Gy in both the small and large ENLN groups. The multivariate analysis also confirmed that BED ≥72 Gy was not associated with significantly improved prognosis in patients with N0-category NPC. A BED of 72 Gy to ENLNs is considerably sufficient to provide a clinical benefit to patients with N0-category NPC. Prospective studies are warranted to validate the findings in the present study.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 26 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 4 15%
Other 3 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 12%
Professor 2 8%
Student > Master 2 8%
Other 3 12%
Unknown 9 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 31%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 8%
Philosophy 1 4%
Psychology 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 11 42%