↓ Skip to main content

Early versus late tracheostomy for critically ill patients

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (59th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
13 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
q&a
1 Q&A thread

Citations

dimensions_citation
87 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
190 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Early versus late tracheostomy for critically ill patients
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2015
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007271.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Brenda NG Andriolo, Regis B Andriolo, Humberto Saconato, Álvaro N Atallah, Orsine Valente

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 190 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 2%
United States 2 1%
France 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 183 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 34 18%
Researcher 27 14%
Student > Postgraduate 25 13%
Student > Bachelor 20 11%
Other 19 10%
Other 43 23%
Unknown 22 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 111 58%
Nursing and Health Professions 22 12%
Psychology 6 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 2%
Social Sciences 3 2%
Other 14 7%
Unknown 31 16%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 October 2019.
All research outputs
#1,244,696
of 14,116,115 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,628
of 10,854 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,905
of 297,971 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#103
of 252 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,116,115 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,854 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 297,971 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 252 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.