↓ Skip to main content

Peritoneal closure versus no peritoneal closure for patients undergoing non-obstetric abdominal operations

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
102 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Peritoneal closure versus no peritoneal closure for patients undergoing non-obstetric abdominal operations
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd010424.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kurinchi Selvan Gurusamy, Etienne Cassar Delia, Brian R Davidson

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 102 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Tanzania, United Republic of 1 <1%
Unknown 99 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 17 17%
Student > Master 13 13%
Student > Postgraduate 12 12%
Student > Bachelor 12 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 11%
Other 24 24%
Unknown 13 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 59 58%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 10%
Psychology 6 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 2%
Social Sciences 2 2%
Other 6 6%
Unknown 17 17%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 July 2020.
All research outputs
#4,586,443
of 16,522,348 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,220
of 11,525 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#128,744
of 413,214 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#160
of 233 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,522,348 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,525 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.4. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 413,214 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 233 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.