↓ Skip to main content

Pressure-controlled versus volume-controlled ventilation for acute respiratory failure due to acute lung injury (ALI) or acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS)

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
13 tweeters
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
42 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
196 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Pressure-controlled versus volume-controlled ventilation for acute respiratory failure due to acute lung injury (ALI) or acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS)
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2015
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008807.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Binila Chacko, John V Peter, Prathap Tharyan, George John, Lakshmanan Jeyaseelan

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 196 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Unknown 191 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 43 22%
Unspecified 33 17%
Researcher 24 12%
Student > Postgraduate 21 11%
Student > Bachelor 20 10%
Other 55 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 102 52%
Unspecified 41 21%
Nursing and Health Professions 21 11%
Psychology 7 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 5 3%
Other 20 10%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 August 2017.
All research outputs
#958,307
of 13,588,841 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,935
of 10,646 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,318
of 296,388 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#79
of 253 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,588,841 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,646 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 296,388 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 253 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.