↓ Skip to main content

The concentration of D-dimers in portal blood positively correlates with overall survival in patients with non-resectable pancreatic cancer

Overview of attention for article published in World Journal of Surgical Oncology, December 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
14 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The concentration of D-dimers in portal blood positively correlates with overall survival in patients with non-resectable pancreatic cancer
Published in
World Journal of Surgical Oncology, December 2017
DOI 10.1186/s12957-017-1291-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Adam Durczynski, Aleksander Skulimowski, Piotr Hogendorf, Dariusz Szymanski, Anna Kumor, Konrad Marski, Siri Øvereng Juliebø, Grazyna Poznanska, Janusz Strzelczyk

Abstract

Several recent studies provide evidence that D-dimer (DD) concentration in peripheral blood correlates negatively with overall survival (OS) in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Contrarily, there are recent evidence indicating that preoperative plasma fibrinogen, but not D-dimer might represent a prognostic factor in non-metastatic gastrointestinal cancers. In a single-center prospective study, we enrolled 62 patients undergoing surgery for pathologically confirmed PDAC without detectable venous thrombosis. Intraoperatively, the sample of the blood from the portal vein was obtained. DD concentration in these samples was measured. Patients were followed postoperatively until time of death from any cause. We found that OS for patients with portal blood DD values above 2700 (ng/mL) (n = 22 from 62 patients) was higher by 158% than that for the patients (n = 42) with DD values ≤ 2700 (416 days versus 161 days, p = 0.05). On the contrary to the studies investigating DD concentration in peripheral blood, we have found that patients with higher DD level in the portal vein had longer mean OS than patients with lower ones. Further investigation is necessary both to confirm our results in a larger patient population and to elucidate the mechanism for the correlation between portal blood D-dimer concentrations and survival time. Along with other authors, we conclude that portal circulation is characterized by unique, biological environment that requires further evaluation.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 14 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 3 21%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 7%
Student > Bachelor 1 7%
Other 1 7%
Researcher 1 7%
Other 1 7%
Unknown 6 43%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 4 29%
Social Sciences 1 7%
Environmental Science 1 7%
Unknown 8 57%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 December 2017.
All research outputs
#20,456,235
of 23,012,811 outputs
Outputs from World Journal of Surgical Oncology
#1,587
of 2,055 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#375,543
of 440,140 outputs
Outputs of similar age from World Journal of Surgical Oncology
#18
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,012,811 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,055 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.1. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 440,140 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.