You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Diagnosing cancer in primary care: results from the National Cancer Diagnosis Audit
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
British Journal of General Practice, December 2017
|
| DOI | 10.3399/bjgp17x694169 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ruth Swann, Sean McPhail, Jana Witt, Brian Shand, Gary A Abel, Sara Hiom, Jem Rashbass, Georgios Lyratzopoulos, Greg Rubin, Cancer Diagnosis Audit Steering Group |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 62 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 29 | 47% |
| United States | 3 | 5% |
| Australia | 2 | 3% |
| Greece | 2 | 3% |
| Spain | 2 | 3% |
| Ireland | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 23 | 37% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 39 | 63% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 15 | 24% |
| Scientists | 5 | 8% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 164 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 164 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 25 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 16 | 10% |
| Other | 11 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 7% |
| Other | 32 | 20% |
| Unknown | 53 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 46 | 28% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 10 | 6% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 6 | 4% |
| Psychology | 6 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 3% |
| Other | 25 | 15% |
| Unknown | 66 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 127. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 November 2023.
All research outputs
#333,407
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of General Practice
#124
of 4,934 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,404
of 450,817 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of General Practice
#4
of 97 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,934 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 450,817 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 97 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.