↓ Skip to main content

Social Networks, Social Media, and Innovating Surgical Education

Overview of attention for article published in JAMA Surgery, March 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
66 tweeters
facebook
5 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
26 Mendeley
Title
Social Networks, Social Media, and Innovating Surgical Education
Published in
JAMA Surgery, March 2015
DOI 10.1001/jamasurg.2014.1324
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ravinder S. Vohra, Michael T. Hallissey

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 66 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 8%
Unknown 24 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 7 27%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 15%
Unspecified 3 12%
Researcher 3 12%
Other 3 12%
Other 9 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 46%
Social Sciences 4 15%
Unspecified 4 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 8%
Other 5 19%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 45. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 March 2017.
All research outputs
#366,096
of 13,193,719 outputs
Outputs from JAMA Surgery
#475
of 2,105 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,211
of 292,652 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA Surgery
#13
of 79 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,193,719 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,105 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 44.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 292,652 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 79 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.