↓ Skip to main content

Social Networks, Social Media, and Innovating Surgical Education

Overview of attention for article published in JAMA Surgery, March 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
60 tweeters
facebook
5 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
28 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
39 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Social Networks, Social Media, and Innovating Surgical Education
Published in
JAMA Surgery, March 2015
DOI 10.1001/jamasurg.2014.1324
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ravinder S. Vohra, Michael T. Hallissey

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 60 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 5%
Unknown 37 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 7 18%
Researcher 4 10%
Student > Postgraduate 4 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 10%
Other 3 8%
Other 7 18%
Unknown 10 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 31%
Social Sciences 4 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 5%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 3%
Other 6 15%
Unknown 12 31%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 41. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 March 2017.
All research outputs
#757,633
of 21,144,390 outputs
Outputs from JAMA Surgery
#813
of 3,071 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,238
of 342,905 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA Surgery
#14
of 78 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,144,390 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,071 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 47.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 342,905 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 78 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.