| Title |
Physical activity and all-cause mortality across levels of overall and abdominal adiposity in European men and women: the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition Study (EPIC) 2–5
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, January 2015
|
| DOI | 10.3945/ajcn.114.100065 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ulf Ekelund, Heather A Ward, Teresa Norat, Jian'an Luan, Anne M May, Elisabete Weiderpass, Stephen J Sharp, Kim Overvad, Jane Nautrup Østergaard, Anne Tjønneland, Nina Føns Johnsen, Sylvie Mesrine, Agnès Fournier, Guy Fagherazzi, Antonia Trichopoulou, Pagona Lagiou, Dimitrios Trichopoulos, Kuanrong Li, Rudolf Kaaks, Pietro Ferrari, Idlir Licaj, Mazda Jenab, Manuela Bergmann, Heiner Boeing, Domenico Palli, Sabina Sieri, Salvatore Panico, Rosario Tumino, Paolo Vineis, Petra H Peeters, Evelyn Monnikhof, H Bas Bueno-de-Mesquita, J Ramón Quirós, Antonio Agudo, María-José Sánchez, José María Huerta, Eva Ardanaz, Larraitz Arriola, Bo Hedblad, Elisabet Wirfält, Malin Sund, Mattias Johansson, Timothy J Key, Ruth C Travis, Kay-Tee Khaw, Søren Brage, Nicholas J Wareham, Elio Riboli |
| Abstract |
The higher risk of death resulting from excess adiposity may be attenuated by physical activity (PA). However, the theoretical number of deaths reduced by eliminating physical inactivity compared with overall and abdominal obesity remains unclear. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 625 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 123 | 20% |
| United States | 60 | 10% |
| Spain | 58 | 9% |
| Netherlands | 40 | 6% |
| Canada | 20 | 3% |
| Saudi Arabia | 17 | 3% |
| Mexico | 9 | 1% |
| Australia | 9 | 1% |
| Japan | 6 | <1% |
| Other | 54 | 9% |
| Unknown | 229 | 37% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 434 | 69% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 100 | 16% |
| Scientists | 81 | 13% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 10 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 621 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 11 | 2% |
| United States | 6 | <1% |
| Spain | 5 | <1% |
| Norway | 2 | <1% |
| Australia | 2 | <1% |
| Japan | 2 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| New Zealand | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 6 | <1% |
| Unknown | 584 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 92 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 83 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 77 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 71 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 41 | 7% |
| Other | 148 | 24% |
| Unknown | 109 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 164 | 26% |
| Sports and Recreations | 72 | 12% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 49 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 39 | 6% |
| Psychology | 31 | 5% |
| Other | 115 | 19% |
| Unknown | 151 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1071. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 November 2023.
All research outputs
#14,706
of 25,744,802 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
#42
of 12,664 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#105
of 363,190 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
#1
of 70 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,744,802 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,664 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 363,190 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 70 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.