You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Erratum to: BatTool: an R package with GUI for assessing the effect of white-nose syndrome and other take events on Myotis spp. of bats
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Source Code for Biology and Medicine, December 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13029-014-0028-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Richard A Erickson, Wayne E Thogmartin, Jennifer A Szymanski |
| Abstract |
[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1186/1751-0473-9-9.]. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 February 2016.
All research outputs
#18,389,490
of 22,778,347 outputs
Outputs from Source Code for Biology and Medicine
#102
of 127 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#255,955
of 353,195 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Source Code for Biology and Medicine
#5
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,778,347 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 127 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,195 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.