↓ Skip to main content

Dietary patterns and colorectal cancer: results from a Canadian population-based study

Overview of attention for article published in Nutrition Journal, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
twitter
29 tweeters
facebook
16 Facebook pages
googleplus
2 Google+ users

Citations

dimensions_citation
34 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
121 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Dietary patterns and colorectal cancer: results from a Canadian population-based study
Published in
Nutrition Journal, January 2015
DOI 10.1186/1475-2891-14-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Zhi Chen, Peizhong Peter Wang, Jennifer Woodrow, Yun Zhu, Barbara Roebothan, John R Mclaughlin, Patrick S Parfrey

Abstract

The relationship between major dietary patterns and colorectal cancer (CRC) in other populations largely remains consistent across studies. The objective of the present study is to assess if dietary patterns are associated with the risk of CRC in the population of Newfoundland and Labrador (NL).

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 29 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 121 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 120 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 20%
Student > Master 23 19%
Student > Bachelor 22 18%
Researcher 10 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 7%
Other 18 15%
Unknown 15 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 30 25%
Nursing and Health Professions 29 24%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 21 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 6%
Chemistry 3 2%
Other 12 10%
Unknown 19 16%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 53. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 January 2020.
All research outputs
#469,463
of 17,039,068 outputs
Outputs from Nutrition Journal
#157
of 1,273 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,265
of 357,067 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nutrition Journal
#24
of 117 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,039,068 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,273 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 357,067 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 117 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.