You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Dietary patterns and colorectal cancer: results from a Canadian population-based study
|
---|---|
Published in |
Nutrition Journal, January 2015
|
DOI | 10.1186/1475-2891-14-8 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Zhi Chen, Peizhong Peter Wang, Jennifer Woodrow, Yun Zhu, Barbara Roebothan, John R Mclaughlin, Patrick S Parfrey |
Abstract |
The relationship between major dietary patterns and colorectal cancer (CRC) in other populations largely remains consistent across studies. The objective of the present study is to assess if dietary patterns are associated with the risk of CRC in the population of Newfoundland and Labrador (NL). |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 29 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 4 | 14% |
New Zealand | 4 | 14% |
Australia | 3 | 10% |
Canada | 2 | 7% |
Israel | 1 | 3% |
Spain | 1 | 3% |
Comoros | 1 | 3% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 3% |
Italy | 1 | 3% |
Other | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 10 | 34% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 21 | 72% |
Scientists | 4 | 14% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 10% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 170 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 169 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 27 | 16% |
Student > Bachelor | 27 | 16% |
Student > Master | 23 | 14% |
Researcher | 12 | 7% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 11 | 6% |
Other | 24 | 14% |
Unknown | 46 | 27% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 34 | 20% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 34 | 20% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 24 | 14% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 4% |
Unspecified | 4 | 2% |
Other | 20 | 12% |
Unknown | 47 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 71. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 February 2024.
All research outputs
#606,915
of 25,540,105 outputs
Outputs from Nutrition Journal
#190
of 1,527 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,880
of 378,272 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nutrition Journal
#9
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,540,105 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,527 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 378,272 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.