↓ Skip to main content

Predictors of survival for breast cancer patients with a BRCA1 mutation

Overview of attention for article published in Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, December 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
10 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
30 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Predictors of survival for breast cancer patients with a BRCA1 mutation
Published in
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, December 2017
DOI 10.1007/s10549-017-4605-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Steven A. Narod, Tomasz Huzarski, Jacek Gronwald, Tomasz Byrski, Elzbieta Marczyk, Cezary Cybulski, Marek Szwiec, Rafal Wisniowski, Bozena Birkenfeld, Ewa Kilar, Robert Sibilski, Ping Sun, Jan Lubinski

Abstract

To evaluate in a contemporary cohort the impacts of chemotherapy and oophorectomy on survival for breast cancer patients with a BRCA1 mutation. We reviewed the pathology reports and medical records of 372 women with breast cancer and a BRCA1 mutation, diagnosed from 2005 to 2017, between the ages of 25 and 65 and followed them for death from all causes and death from breast cancer. Death was ascertained through the Poland vital statistics registry. We performed survival analysis to evaluate the impacts of chemotherapy (including neoadjuvant cisplatinum) and of oophorectomy on survival. After a mean follow-up of 5.6 years (median 5.2), 66 of the 372 women died; 56 of the deaths were from breast cancer and 6 were from ovarian cancer. 127 women received neoadjuvant cisplatinum and 245 women received other chemotherapies. Cisplatinum (versus all other therapies) was associated with a hazard ratio of 0.42 (95%CI 0.20-0.87) on breast cancer-specific survival. The 10-year actuarial all-cause survival for women who had both cisplatinum and an oophorectomy was 94.4%. The 10-year all-cause survival for women who had neither cisplatinum nor an oophorectomy was 65.4% (p < 0.01). Cisplatinum and oophorectomy are effective therapies for women with breast cancer and a BRCA1 mutation.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 30 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 33%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 10%
Student > Postgraduate 2 7%
Student > Master 2 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 7%
Other 4 13%
Unknown 7 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 43%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 7%
Chemistry 2 7%
Mathematics 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 9 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 December 2017.
All research outputs
#5,478,693
of 23,012,811 outputs
Outputs from Breast Cancer Research and Treatment
#1,202
of 4,681 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#105,853
of 439,661 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Breast Cancer Research and Treatment
#23
of 68 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,012,811 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,681 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 439,661 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 68 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.