↓ Skip to main content

The Non-hydrostatic Icosahedral Atmospheric Model: description and development

Overview of attention for article published in Progress in Earth and Planetary Science, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#50 of 596)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
13 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
305 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
130 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Non-hydrostatic Icosahedral Atmospheric Model: description and development
Published in
Progress in Earth and Planetary Science, October 2014
DOI 10.1186/s40645-014-0018-1
Authors

Masaki Satoh, Hirofumi Tomita, Hisashi Yashiro, Hiroaki Miura, Chihiro Kodama, Tatsuya Seiki, Akira T Noda, Yohei Yamada, Daisuke Goto, Masahiro Sawada, Takemasa Miyoshi, Yosuke Niwa, Masayuki Hara, Tomoki Ohno, Shin-ichi Iga, Takashi Arakawa, Takahiro Inoue, Hiroyasu Kubokawa

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 130 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 3 2%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 126 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 39 30%
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 19%
Student > Master 10 8%
Student > Postgraduate 8 6%
Student > Bachelor 7 5%
Other 15 12%
Unknown 26 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 64 49%
Environmental Science 11 8%
Engineering 7 5%
Computer Science 6 5%
Mathematics 4 3%
Other 10 8%
Unknown 28 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 September 2021.
All research outputs
#3,006,881
of 25,563,770 outputs
Outputs from Progress in Earth and Planetary Science
#50
of 596 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,901
of 268,533 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Progress in Earth and Planetary Science
#3
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,563,770 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 596 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 268,533 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.