↓ Skip to main content

Adjunctive hyperbaric oxygen for necrotizing fasciitis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
85 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Adjunctive hyperbaric oxygen for necrotizing fasciitis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2015
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007937.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Denny Z Levett, Michael H Bennett, Ian Millar

Abstract

Hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) involves the therapeutic administration of 100% oxygen in a pressure chamber at pressures above one atmosphere absolute. This therapy has been used as an adjunct to surgery and antibiotics in the treatment of patients with necrotizing fasciitis with the aim of reducing morbidity and mortality.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 85 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Denmark 1 1%
Andorra 1 1%
Singapore 1 1%
Unknown 80 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 13 15%
Student > Master 13 15%
Researcher 12 14%
Student > Bachelor 9 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 9%
Other 29 34%
Unknown 1 1%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 46 54%
Unspecified 17 20%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 6%
Computer Science 4 5%
Social Sciences 3 4%
Other 9 11%
Unknown 1 1%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 March 2019.
All research outputs
#1,534,602
of 13,139,039 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,207
of 10,497 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,957
of 274,454 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#119
of 250 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,139,039 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,497 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 274,454 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 250 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.