↓ Skip to main content

Genomic study of severe fetal anomalies and discovery of GREB1L mutations in renal agenesis

Overview of attention for article published in Genetics in Medicine, October 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
60 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
80 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Genomic study of severe fetal anomalies and discovery of GREB1L mutations in renal agenesis
Published in
Genetics in Medicine, October 2017
DOI 10.1038/gim.2017.173
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sarah Boissel, Catherine Fallet-Bianco, David Chitayat, Valérie Kremer, Christina Nassif, Françoise Rypens, Marie-Ange Delrue, Dorothée Dal Soglio, Luc L Oligny, Natalie Patey, Elisabeth Flori, Mireille Cloutier, David Dyment, Philippe Campeau, Aspasia Karalis, Sonia Nizard, William D Fraser, François Audibert, Emmanuelle Lemyre, Guy A Rouleau, Fadi F Hamdan, Zoha Kibar, Jacques L Michaud

Abstract

PurposeFetal anomalies represent a poorly studied group of developmental disorders. Our objective was to assess the impact of whole-exome sequencing (WES) on the investigation of these anomalies.MethodsWe performed WES in 101 fetuses or stillborns who presented prenatally with severe anomalies, including renal a/dysgenesis, VACTERL association (vertebral defects, anal atresia, cardiac defects, tracheoesophageal fistula, renal anomalies, and limb abnormalities), brain anomalies, suspected ciliopathies, multiple major malformations, and akinesia.ResultsA molecular diagnosis was obtained in 19 cases (19%). In 13 of these cases, the diagnosis was not initially suspected by the clinicians because the phenotype was nonspecific or atypical, corresponding in some cases to the severe end of the spectrum of a known disease (e.g., MNX1-, RYR1-, or TUBB-related disorders). In addition, we identified likely pathogenic variants in genes (DSTYK, ACTB, and HIVEP2) previously associated with phenotypes that were substantially different from those found in our cases. Finally, we identified variants in novel candidate genes that were associated with perinatal lethality, including de novo mutations in GREB1L in two cases with bilateral renal agenesis, which represents a significant enrichment of such mutations in our cohort.ConclusionOur study opens a window on the distinctive genetic landscape associated with fetal anomalies and highlights the power-but also the challenges-of WES in prenatal diagnosis.Genet Med advance online publication, 26 October 2017; doi:10.1038/gim.2017.173.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 80 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 80 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 14%
Student > Master 10 13%
Researcher 9 11%
Student > Bachelor 9 11%
Student > Postgraduate 6 8%
Other 19 24%
Unknown 16 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 27 34%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 21 26%
Unspecified 4 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 4%
Sports and Recreations 2 3%
Other 4 5%
Unknown 19 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 December 2017.
All research outputs
#17,242,285
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Genetics in Medicine
#2,595
of 2,945 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#215,441
of 338,126 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genetics in Medicine
#61
of 66 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,945 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.0. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 338,126 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 66 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.