↓ Skip to main content

Complementary therapies for acne vulgaris.

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
20 tweeters
facebook
11 Facebook pages
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Readers on

mendeley
40 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Complementary therapies for acne vulgaris.
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2015
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009436.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Cao H, Yang G, Wang Y, Liu JP, Smith CA, Luo H, Liu Y, Cao, Huijuan, Yang, Guoyan, Wang, Yuyi, Liu, Jian Ping, Smith, Caroline A, Luo, Hui, Liu, Yueming, Huijuan Cao, Guoyan Yang, Yuyi Wang, Jian Ping Liu, Caroline A Smith, Hui Luo, Yueming Liu

Abstract

Acne is a chronic skin disease characterised by inflamed spots and blackheads on the face, neck, back, and chest. Cysts and scarring can also occur, especially in more severe disease. People with acne often turn to complementary and alternative medicine (CAM), such as herbal medicine, acupuncture, and dietary modifications, because of their concerns about the adverse effects of conventional medicines. However, evidence for CAM therapies has not been systematically assessed.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 3%
Unknown 39 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 10 25%
Unspecified 8 20%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 15%
Student > Postgraduate 4 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 8%
Other 9 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 21 53%
Unspecified 8 20%
Arts and Humanities 2 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 5%
Chemical Engineering 1 3%
Other 6 15%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 47. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 April 2018.
All research outputs
#263,195
of 11,362,070 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#870
of 9,073 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,089
of 251,762 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#31
of 246 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 11,362,070 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,073 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 251,762 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 246 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.