↓ Skip to main content

Breastfeeding in public: “You can do it?”

Overview of attention for article published in International Breastfeeding Journal, December 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#28 of 612)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
58 X users
facebook
8 Facebook pages
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
36 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
82 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Breastfeeding in public: “You can do it?”
Published in
International Breastfeeding Journal, December 2014
DOI 10.1186/s13006-014-0026-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lisa H Amir

Abstract

On a regular basis there is an outcry about a mother who has been told to cover up or move away from a public area while she is breastfeeding. Mothers should feel free to breastfeed whenever they need to. However, the increasing market for "nursing covers" to hide the breast while feeding is evidence of changing perceptions. Discomfort with the idea of breastfeeding in public has been cited as a reason for some women choosing not to initiate breastfeeding or planning a shorter duration of breastfeeding. Other women are choosing to express and bottle-feed their expressed milk when they are in public. In many cultures today there is a conflict between the concept of breast milk being pure (like tears), and contaminated or "dirty" (like genital secretions or vomit). In these settings the female breast may be considered primarily a sexual organ, and therefore a private part of the body, which needs to be invisible in the public arena. In order to increase breastfeeding initiation and duration and to reduce health inequities breastfeeding needs to be more visible. Let's strive together to make breastfeeding in public unremarkable.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 58 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 82 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
New Zealand 1 1%
Unknown 80 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 22 27%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 13%
Student > Master 9 11%
Lecturer 6 7%
Researcher 4 5%
Other 8 10%
Unknown 22 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 17 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 12%
Social Sciences 10 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 7%
Psychology 4 5%
Other 13 16%
Unknown 22 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 54. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 March 2024.
All research outputs
#784,757
of 25,497,142 outputs
Outputs from International Breastfeeding Journal
#28
of 612 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,852
of 360,604 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Breastfeeding Journal
#1
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,497,142 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 612 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 360,604 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them