↓ Skip to main content

The Impact of Lidar Elevation Uncertainty on Mapping Intertidal Habitats on Barrier Islands

Overview of attention for article published in Remote Sensing, December 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
28 Mendeley
Title
The Impact of Lidar Elevation Uncertainty on Mapping Intertidal Habitats on Barrier Islands
Published in
Remote Sensing, December 2017
DOI 10.3390/rs10010005
Authors

Nicholas Enwright, Lei Wang, Sinéad Borchert, Richard Day, Laura Feher, Michael Osland

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 28 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 32%
Student > Master 7 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 11%
Professor 1 4%
Student > Bachelor 1 4%
Other 6 21%
Unknown 1 4%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 12 43%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 6 21%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 18%
Computer Science 2 7%
Unspecified 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 2 7%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 January 2018.
All research outputs
#2,947,295
of 12,439,436 outputs
Outputs from Remote Sensing
#586
of 3,736 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#99,036
of 360,859 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Remote Sensing
#37
of 259 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,439,436 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,736 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 360,859 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 259 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.