↓ Skip to main content

Differences in brachial and femoral artery responses to prolonged sitting

Overview of attention for article published in Cardiovascular Ultrasound, December 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#37 of 310)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
59 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
102 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Differences in brachial and femoral artery responses to prolonged sitting
Published in
Cardiovascular Ultrasound, December 2014
DOI 10.1186/1476-7120-12-50
Pubmed ID
Authors

Saurabh S Thosar, Sylvanna L Bielko, Chad C Wiggins, Janet P Wallace

Abstract

It is unknown if there are limb differences in vascular function during prolonged sitting.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 102 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 102 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 20%
Student > Master 15 15%
Student > Bachelor 14 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 7%
Researcher 7 7%
Other 12 12%
Unknown 27 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 24 24%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 15%
Sports and Recreations 10 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 4%
Engineering 3 3%
Other 11 11%
Unknown 35 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 January 2015.
All research outputs
#4,100,760
of 22,778,347 outputs
Outputs from Cardiovascular Ultrasound
#37
of 310 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#57,943
of 354,448 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cardiovascular Ultrasound
#4
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,778,347 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 310 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 354,448 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.