↓ Skip to main content

Rheumatic fever: update on the Jones criteria according to the American Heart Association review – 2015

Overview of attention for article published in Advances in Rheumatology, April 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
97 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Rheumatic fever: update on the Jones criteria according to the American Heart Association review – 2015
Published in
Advances in Rheumatology, April 2017
DOI 10.1016/j.rbre.2017.03.001
Pubmed ID
Authors

Breno Álvares de Faria Pereira, Alinne Rodrigues Belo, Nilzio Antônio da Silva

Abstract

Rheumatic fever is still currently a prevalent disease, especially in developing countries. Triggered by a Group A β-hemolytic Streptococcus infection, the disease may affect genetically predisposed patients. Rheumatic carditis is the most important of its clinical manifestations, which can generate incapacitating sequelae of great impact for the individual and for society. Currently, its diagnosis is made based on the Jones criteria, established in 1992 by the American Heart Association. In 2015, the AHA carried out a significant review of these criteria, with new diagnostic parameters and recommendations. In the present study, the authors perform a critical analysis of this new review, emphasizing the most relevant points for clinical practice.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 97 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 97 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 20 21%
Student > Master 10 10%
Student > Postgraduate 7 7%
Other 5 5%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 4%
Other 13 13%
Unknown 38 39%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 50 52%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 2%
Arts and Humanities 1 1%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 1%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 1%
Other 2 2%
Unknown 40 41%