↓ Skip to main content

An analysis of DNA methylation in human adipose tissue reveals differential modification of obesity genes before and after gastric bypass and weight loss

Overview of attention for article published in Genome Biology (Online Edition), January 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
37 tweeters
facebook
5 Facebook pages
googleplus
2 Google+ users

Citations

dimensions_citation
183 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
252 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
An analysis of DNA methylation in human adipose tissue reveals differential modification of obesity genes before and after gastric bypass and weight loss
Published in
Genome Biology (Online Edition), January 2015
DOI 10.1186/s13059-014-0569-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Miles C Benton, Alice Johnstone, David Eccles, Brennan Harmon, Mark T Hayes, Rod A Lea, Lyn Griffiths, Eric P Hoffman, Richard S Stubbs, Donia Macartney-Coxson

Abstract

Environmental factors can influence obesity by epigenetic mechanisms. Adipose tissue plays a key role in obesity-related metabolic dysfunction, and gastric bypass provides a model to investigate obesity and weight loss in humans.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 37 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 252 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 <1%
Hong Kong 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Nigeria 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 243 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 54 21%
Researcher 44 17%
Student > Master 30 12%
Student > Bachelor 23 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 17 7%
Other 42 17%
Unknown 42 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 60 24%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 59 23%
Medicine and Dentistry 50 20%
Computer Science 6 2%
Sports and Recreations 4 2%
Other 17 7%
Unknown 56 22%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 November 2017.
All research outputs
#1,506,655
of 23,314,015 outputs
Outputs from Genome Biology (Online Edition)
#1,298
of 4,168 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,378
of 354,476 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genome Biology (Online Edition)
#26
of 70 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,314,015 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,168 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 354,476 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 70 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.