↓ Skip to main content

Procalcitonin, C-reactive protein, and erythrocyte sedimentation rate for the diagnosis of acute pyelonephritis in children

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
5 tweeters
facebook
4 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
34 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
107 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Procalcitonin, C-reactive protein, and erythrocyte sedimentation rate for the diagnosis of acute pyelonephritis in children
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2015
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009185.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nader Shaikh, Jessica L Borrell, Josh Evron, Mariska MG Leeflang

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 107 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 105 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 20 19%
Researcher 18 17%
Other 11 10%
Student > Master 10 9%
Student > Postgraduate 9 8%
Other 27 25%
Unknown 12 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 63 59%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 4%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3 3%
Other 10 9%
Unknown 15 14%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 January 2018.
All research outputs
#2,090,374
of 12,452,535 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,086
of 8,628 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,606
of 267,280 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#127
of 235 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,452,535 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,628 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 267,280 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 235 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.