You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Anti‐histamines for prolonged non‐specific cough in children
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2008
|
DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd005604.pub3 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Anne B Chang, Jane Peake, Margaret S McElrea |
Abstract |
Non-specific cough is defined as non-productive cough in the absence of identifiable respiratory disease or known aetiology. It is commonly seen in paediatric practice. These children are treated with a variety of therapies including anti-histamines. Also, anti-histamines are advocated as an empirical treatment in adults with chronic cough. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Ecuador | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 138 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Brazil | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 137 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 14 | 10% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 9% |
Student > Bachelor | 11 | 8% |
Researcher | 10 | 7% |
Professor | 5 | 4% |
Other | 25 | 18% |
Unknown | 60 | 43% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 30 | 22% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 13 | 9% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 8 | 6% |
Psychology | 4 | 3% |
Social Sciences | 4 | 3% |
Other | 11 | 8% |
Unknown | 68 | 49% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 31. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 November 2020.
All research outputs
#1,279,391
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,699
of 11,842 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,767
of 92,972 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#11
of 55 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,842 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 92,972 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 55 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.