↓ Skip to main content

Dynamic foot function as a risk factor for lower limb overuse injury: a systematic review

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Foot and Ankle Research, December 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
16 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
67 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
451 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Dynamic foot function as a risk factor for lower limb overuse injury: a systematic review
Published in
Journal of Foot and Ankle Research, December 2014
DOI 10.1186/s13047-014-0053-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Geoffrey J Dowling, George S Murley, Shannon E Munteanu, Melinda M Franettovich Smith, Bradley S Neal, Ian B Griffiths, Christian J Barton, Natalie J Collins

Abstract

Dynamic foot function is considered a risk factor for lower limb overuse injuries including Achilles tendinopathy, shin pain, patellofemoral pain and stress fractures. However, no single source has systematically appraised and summarised the literature to evaluate this proposed relationship. The aim of this systematic review was to investigate dynamic foot function as a risk factor for lower limb overuse injury.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 451 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 <1%
Spain 3 <1%
Italy 2 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Thailand 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 437 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 93 21%
Student > Bachelor 73 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 57 13%
Other 32 7%
Researcher 29 6%
Other 97 22%
Unknown 70 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 132 29%
Sports and Recreations 82 18%
Nursing and Health Professions 81 18%
Engineering 13 3%
Unspecified 12 3%
Other 34 8%
Unknown 97 22%