↓ Skip to main content

Comparative Genomics

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 3: Comparative Genomics for Prokaryotes
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
91 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Comparative Genomics for Prokaryotes
Chapter number 3
Book title
Comparative Genomics
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, January 2018
DOI 10.1007/978-1-4939-7463-4_3
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-4939-7461-0, 978-1-4939-7463-4
Authors

João C. Setubal, Nalvo F. Almeida, Alice R. Wattam

Abstract

Bacteria and archaea, collectively known as prokaryotes, have in general genomes that are much smaller than those of eukaryotes. As a result, thousands of these genomes have been sequenced. In prokaryotes, gene architecture lacks the intron-exon structure of eukaryotic genes (with an occasional exception). These two facts mean that there is an abundance of data for prokaryotic genomes, and that they are easier to study than the more complex eukaryotic genomes. In this chapter, we provide an overview of genome comparison tools that have been developed primarily (sometimes exclusively) for prokaryotic genomes. We cover methods that use only the DNA sequences, methods that use only the gene content, and methods that use both data types.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 91 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 91 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 20%
Student > Master 13 14%
Student > Bachelor 12 13%
Researcher 10 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 3%
Other 8 9%
Unknown 27 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 25 27%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 23 25%
Unspecified 4 4%
Computer Science 4 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 3%
Other 5 5%
Unknown 27 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 November 2020.
All research outputs
#15,061,695
of 24,353,295 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#4,250
of 13,705 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#242,155
of 450,993 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#406
of 1,481 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,353,295 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,705 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 450,993 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,481 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.